It's currently defined as "A IRI template that can be
used to query a collection" (note a typo: "An IRI"), which hints
that it's rdfs:domain is hydra:Collection. This is not captured
explicitly in the RDF description of Hydra.
Yeah, that's true. But I think we should rather fix the description and not the domain. Or we use schema:domainIncludes (probably better). hydra:search isn't very well defined at the moment.
I think I'd prefer using schema:domainIncludes (because of its
intended owl:unionOf-like semantics). When you say that we should fix
the description of hydra:search, do you mean that it should be
broadened to not only hint to hydra:Collection?
_This was discussed on the mailing list:_