search

HyperAgents / hmas

An ontology to describe Hypermedia Multi-Agent Systems, interactions, and organizations.
https://purl.org/hmas/
1 stars 0 forks source link

A question about fipa:AgentDescription #174

Closed YoucTagh closed 10 months ago

YoucTagh commented 11 months ago

In core.ttl, :ResourceProfile mentions fipa:AgentDescription as an example. However, there is no such class in fipa.ttl.

Also, the prefix fipa is used in that skos:example when it is not defined with the prefixes. Meanwhile, there are other prefixes that are defined but not used: voaf and foaf.

FabienGandon commented 11 months ago

For FIPA: as the mention of fipa:AgentDescription is inside a literal there is no syntactic problem but one could replace that qname with an expression like "an agent description based on the FIPA standard"

The foaf prefix could be removed indeed since we moved to schema.

The voaf prefix could be kept if we intend to use any of these for instance: voaf:Vocabulary, voaf:classNumber, voaf:propertyNumber

danaivach commented 11 months ago

@andreiciortea, Fabien's proposal appears to address the issue, but I'm reaching out to you because the topic is related to the FIPA OWL ontology that you have contributed.

smnmyr commented 11 months ago

..and there is no initiative to add AgentDescription to the fipa.ttl? It would fit there...

andreiciortea commented 11 months ago

+1 for @FabienGandon's proposal, it is more descriptive and clear

@smnmyr we'll need to update the FIPA vocabulary. For that one, we did not follow a specific methodology. I will bring this up in today's heartbeat meeting.

FabienGandon commented 10 months ago

this issue is now covered in PR #186