Permanent base IRI for the HyperAgents ontologies

[andreiciortea]

Back in Nov. 2021, we postponed choosing a permanent base IRI for the HyperAgents ontologies until the first release.

Choice criteria:

• the IRI should be guaranteed to be persistent; we discussed this at length in the last meeting
• the IRI should be neutral (i.e., not tied to a specific group or institute) to promote community adoption

Two standard proposals that satisfy both criteria — and were also brought into discussion by @maximelefrancois86 in the last meeting:

• PURL (https://purl.org/); PURL was down a few years back, but now it is managed by the Internet Archive, so it seems it is here to stay
• W3ID (https://w3id.org/); managed by the W3C Permanent Identifier Community Group; several companies have pledged responsibility for maintaining the service, the list is on https://w3id.org/

I do not have a strong preference between these 2 options. I would go with PURL because under the Internet Archive it seems to have stronger support for the very long term.

@FabienGandon @oboissier @smnmyr @maximelefrancois86 what are your thoughts? Any other criteria to add to the list?

[maximelefrancois86]

either would be ok for me.

Maxime Lefrançois Associate Professor IMT - MINES Saint-Étienne - Institut Henri Fayol Member of Laboratoire LIMOS - UMR CNRS 6158

De: "Andrei Ciortea" @.> À: "HyperAgents/ns.hyperagents.org" @.> Cc: "Maxime LEFRANCOIS" @.>, "Mention" @.> Envoyé: Jeudi 7 Avril 2022 09:35:13 Objet: [HyperAgents/ns.hyperagents.org] Permanent base IRI for the HyperAgents ontologies (Issue #69)

Back in Nov. 2021, we postponed choosing a permanent base IRI for the HyperAgents ontologies until the first release.

Choice criteria:

* the IRI should be guaranteed to be persistent ; we discussed this at length in the last meeting 
* the IRI should be neutral (i.e., not tied to a specific group or institute) to promote community adoption 

Two standard proposals that satisfy both criteria — and were also brought into discussion by [ https://github.com/maximelefrancois86 | @maximelefrancois86 ] in the last meeting:

* PURL ( [ https://purl.org/ | https://purl.org/ ] ); PURL was down a few years back, but now it is managed by the [ https://archive.org/ | Internet Archive ] , so it seems it is here to stay 
* W3ID ( [ https://w3id.org/ | https://w3id.org/ ] ); managed by the [ https://www.w3.org/community/perma-id/ | W3C Permanent Identifier Community Group ] ; several companies have pledged responsibility for maintaining the service, the list is on [ https://w3id.org/ | https://w3id.org/ ] 

I do not have a strong preference between these 2 options. I would go with PURL because under the Internet Archive it seems to have stronger support for the very long term.

[ https://github.com/FabienGandon | @FabienGandon ] [ https://github.com/oboissier | @oboissier ] [ https://github.com/smnmyr | @smnmyr ] [ https://github.com/maximelefrancois86 | @maximelefrancois86 ] what are your thoughts? Any other criteria to add to the list?

— Reply to this email directly, [ https://github.com/HyperAgents/ns.hyperagents.org/issues/69 | view it on GitHub ] , or [ https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACXDFOHW3HKNWJO3XI3BJLTVD2F3DANCNFSM5SYNNIAA | unsubscribe ] . You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Message ID: <HyperAgents/ns . hyperagents . org/issues/69 @ github . com>

[smnmyr]

Same for me, it should be either of these two. With IA support and its 20+ yr history and with one of the backing companies of w3id currently down itself, I'm leaning towards purl. But not strongly.

[andreiciortea]

I've created PR #78 for this issue with a PURL for the base IRI of the core vocab. cc @FabienGandon @maximelefrancois86 @DrLeturc

Side note: unless I'm missing something, it seems one person cannot request multiple reviewers on a PR in a private repository under a free GitHub organization — but I can add myself as a reviewer to any PR. So please review the PR #78.

[FabienGandon]

Ok for PURL