SCENARIO: Browse items while moving in a physical space (see #369)

[albertelombo]

Co-Authored-By: Quentin HAINOS @qhainos Co-Authored-By: Albert ELOMBO @albertelombo

Content

This is the scenario designed for browsing items in the edifice.

---

Checklist

Please check that your pull request is correct:

• Each commit:
  • [x] corresponds to a contribution that should be notified to users,
  • [x] does not generate new errors or warnings at compile or test time,
  • [x] must be attributed to its real authors (with correct GitHub IDs and correct syntax for multiple authors).
• The title of a commit should:
  • [x] begin with a contribution type
    • FEATURE for a behaviour allowing a user to do something new,
    • FIX for a behaviour which has been changed in order to meet user’s expectations,
    • SCENARIO for examples showing a given behaviour,
    • TEST when it concerns an acceptance test of a given behaviour,
    • PROCESS for a change in the way the software is built, tested, deployed,
    • DOC when it concerns only internal documentation (however it is better to combine it with the contribution that required this documentation change),
  • [x] be followed by a colon (:) with one space after and no space before,
  • [x] be followed by a title (written in English) as short, as user-centered and as explicit as possible
    • If it is a feature, the title must be the user action (beginning with a verb, and please not manage),
    • If it is a fix, the title must describe the intended behavior (with should).
  • [x] ends with a reference to the corresponding ticket with the following syntax:
    • (closes #xx) if xx is a feature ticket (and the commit is a complete implementation),
    • (fixes #xx) if xx is a fix ticket (and the commit is a complete fix),
    • (see #xx) otherwise,
• Each committed line is:
  • [x] useful (it would not work if removed)
    • if it is a comment line, its information could not be conveyed by better variables and function naming, better code structuring, or better commit message,
  • [x] related to this very contribution (feature, fix...),
  • [x] in English (with the exception of Gherkin scenarios in French and resulting steps),
  • [x] without any typo in variable, class or function names,
  • [x] correctly indented (spaces rather than tabs, same number of characters as in the rest of the file).

[albertelombo]

@benel Bonjour Monsieur, Voici notre pull request par rapport au scénario #369
Qu'en pensez-vous?

Contributeurs :

• Quentin HAINOS @qhainos
• Albert ELOMBO @albertelombo

[albertelombo]

@benel Bonjour Monsieur, J'ai réécrit mon commit et je l'ai push. Qu'en pensez-vous? Faudrait-il que je fasse une nouvelle pull request?

[benel]

Merci @albertelombo.

Faudrait-il que je fasse une nouvelle pull request?

Non, mais il faudrait tout remettre dans un seul commit. Vous voyez comment faire ?

Par ailleurs, comme il va s'agir d'une réécriture de l'historique, vous devrez "forcer" le "push".

[albertelombo]

@benel Bonjour monsieur, J'ai effectué les modifications demandées. Vous conviennent-elles?