Maybe someone was concerned about backdoors, or something, but this statement is entirely without context.
Protocols and
security measures protecting against active attacks must also limit
the impact of compromise and malfeasance by avoiding systems which
grant universal credentials.
If my inferences about this statement are correct, then it should still be removed. In its place, a discussion of the virtues of things like the principle of least privilege and how that might limit the damage from inadvertent or coerced bad behaviour.
Maybe someone was concerned about backdoors, or something, but this statement is entirely without context.
If my inferences about this statement are correct, then it should still be removed. In its place, a discussion of the virtues of things like the principle of least privilege and how that might limit the damage from inadvertent or coerced bad behaviour.