Open sevriugin opened 4 months ago
Yes, Canada has a separate GVL from Europe. EU: https://vendor-list.consensu.org/v3/vendor-list.json Canada: https://vendor-list.consensu.org/v2/ca/vendor-list.json
@HeinzBaumann thanks, so we need to have update GPP lib logic to make it multi-GVL ready. Maybe, I am not sure, but API need to be updated also as now these two guys (see the snippet) looks very IAB TCF EU GVL specific:
getGvlFromVendorList(vendorList: VendorList): GVL
async getGvlFromUrl(gvlUrlConfig: GVLUrlConfig): Promise<GVL>
Another question regarding US regulations and vendors. No vendors related signals in US segments (sub-strings) are present, is it correct? The vendors are related ONLY to tcfeuv2
and tcfcav1
, right?
As far as I know, yes, so far vendor signals only apply to tcfeuv2 and tcfcav1.
@HeinzBaumann thanks, so we need to have update GPP lib logic to make it multi-GVL ready. Maybe, I am not sure, but API need to be updated also as now these two guys (see the snippet) looks very IAB TCF EU GVL specific:
getGvlFromVendorList(vendorList: VendorList): GVL async getGvlFromUrl(gvlUrlConfig: GVLUrlConfig): Promise<GVL>
The format and mechanism to retrieve the GVL is the same between EU and Canada. But in a GPP it require to cache both at the same time. So I would think spoec and library will need to account for this.
Yes, we could update GVL
type to make it more genetic and include Canada specific fields like impConsPurposes
, but it will create a mess that it's difficult to manage and support.
For example now GPP GVL still has TCF v2 properties like policyUrl
(optional) that need to be deprecated and urls
also optional that must be present for TCF v2.2. It will be better to have separate types like EuGVL
and CaGVL
and then GVL
= EuGVL
| CaGVL
if needed.
The other problem with VendorList
interface that also need to be regulation specific under the hood as now it holds Vendor
form EuGVL
.
So, maybe it will be easier to have regulation specific functions, like
getEuGvlFromVendorList(vendorList: EuVendorList): EuGVL
async getEuGvlFromUrl(gvlUrlConfig: GVLUrlConfig): Promise<EuGVL>
What do you think @HeinzBaumann
Yes, we could update
GVL
type to make it more genetic and include Canada specific fields likeimpConsPurposes
, but it will create a mess that it's difficult to manage and support.For example now GPP GVL still has TCF v2 properties like
policyUrl
(optional) that need to be deprecated andurls
also optional that must be present for TCF v2.2. It will be better to have separate types likeEuGVL
andCaGVL
and thenGVL
=EuGVL
|CaGVL
if needed.The other problem with
VendorList
interface that also need to be regulation specific under the hood as now it holdsVendor
formEuGVL
.So, maybe it will be easier to have regulation specific functions, like
getEuGvlFromVendorList(vendorList: EuVendorList): EuGVL async getEuGvlFromUrl(gvlUrlConfig: GVLUrlConfig): Promise<EuGVL>
What do you think @HeinzBaumann
That works for me.
Are we going to support GVLs for different regulations in the library? For example IAB Canada GVL for
tcfca
?