Open andkov opened 8 years ago
@andkov
For the black equation, try making this change. It moves to the unused space in the top left, and also makes the alignment easier with Inf
/-Inf
. It can't find one of the gh5 files, so I can't run the graph myself.
Try changing
annotate(geom="text", size=baseSize-6, x=max_i2, y=max_i1, label=R_IPIC_display, hjust=1)+
to
annotate(geom="text", size=baseSize-6, x=-Inf, y=Inf, label=R_IPIC_display, hjust=1.1, vjust=-.1)+
Right now, the legends are determined for each graph separately. For instance the dark purple in the top legend means something different in the bottom legend. Consider if you want a colors to mean the same thing across studies & variable combinations. You may not... especially if these graph go to different publications and are never seen next to each other, or the BAGE
meaning floats between different studies.
@wibeasley ,
span=1.5
, although I don't quite understand the interpretation of the numeric value. think of the graphs in this issue as elemental in the complex superplot
When I work with you, @andkov, I think (& expect) of nothing less than a superplot.
The graph plots factor scores produced by Mplus and stored in .gh5 files. It matches the data in .gh5 to the parameters reports in .out files. Please help interpret the plots and spot oddities by submitting an entry into a table of interpretations. One cell corresponds to one graph. The graphs could be viewed grouped by process pairs for females and males.
Graph legend:
NOTE: some of the models are named inconsistently with the other. They are not mismatched, they just have their coordinates flipped because of the inconsistent naming. You can view the status of and comment to each model in the list of the submitted models.