New function is available to look-up results of individual models.
Data flow for the secondary analysis is conceptualized with regards to tables.
Decisions
The prototype includes covariances between : 1(Intercept Physical - Intercept Cognitive), 2(Slope Physical - Slope Cognitive), 3(Intercept Physical - Slope Cognitive), and 4(Intercept Cognitive - Slope Physical). However, it seems to me that the latter two should be replaced by 3(Intercept Physical - Slope Physical) and 4(Intercept Cognitive - Slope Cognitive) as more descriptive of the model. What do you think?
Add parameter count?
Any new ideas what to do with estimated vs computed correlations? They mostly align, but they are not identical. Using computed will require some non-trivial adjustment to the script because they do not have the standard est-se-wald-pval form provided by MPlus on which much manipulation relies.
Add both covariances. The table should include 6 covariance components. Consider adding ALL covariance components, so that people can decide for themselves what to interpret (laden with danger of inattantion)
Prioritize requesting additional model running by original drivers. Prefer calculated, because it offers greater control.
GSA on Nov 16-20, 2016. Many original drivers will be attending. Think about preparing a tutorial to show how the available results can be used to foster publication production.
Using GSA to experiment
Offer the specific rules for interpretation?
Should workshops be the first step in a 1 or 2-year long collaboration?
GSA interpretation workshop
the deadline to announce the workshop: Sep 16
We scheduled a brainstorming session for 2016-08-30-08:00 PDT
@ampiccinin , @GracielaMuniz , @wibeasley
Agenda
Updates
Decisions
est-se-wald-pval
form provided by MPlus on which much manipulation relies.