Open andkov opened 7 years ago
thanks! Can you please check the axes? I think some of the labels may be misplaced? Some odd things like grip where I think it should be PEF (based on the magnitude)?
@ampiccinin, yes, I have examined the .out
files and corrected the model names (https://github.com/IALSA/IALSA-2015-Portland/commit/97f33af91a82b122f2e839413a1f4688e7ba059c) the next iteration of reports should sort these two models out and draw the correct graphs and tables
@ampiccinin , the new report with corrected names for EAS has been upload and is available after the link above
N for HRS too low. Still pointing to old files? Thanks!
@ampiccinin , I think i found the point of confusion. The files that Chenkai sent the latest, the ones you pointed out having short names and high Ns (I've stored them separately here: ./studies/hrs/physical-cognitive/from-email-2016-10-31)
) are all physical-cognitive. Naturally, this tables of phys-phys do not reflect them. The phys-phys models, while containing the estimated correlations have only ~280 observation (example)
Are there phys-phys models that I've neglected to include? Please let me know, if you recover any.
Tables of results