Open andkov opened 8 years ago
@ampiccinin , the descriptives for HEALTH are ready. Please review the variable description and provide the list of variables that WILL NOT be included into data schema variables. Please pay particular attention to continuous variables. In order to move on to generating response-profiles from data schema variables for this construct we need only categorical variables. If we rule in advance that a particular continuous variable WILL NOT be used for harmonization, we can avoid the expense of categorizing it.
Please provide the name of the study and the original spelling of the variable the WILL NOT be included (e.g. SATSA - GSTOPALK), as well a brief note about the reasons for exclusion.
@andkov –
SHARE varlabels not clear enough to understand meaning of items.
Also – almost 50% missing in all – possibly asked of men and women separately or something?!
From: Andriy V. Koval [mailto:notifications@github.com] Sent: Friday, April 8, 2016 12:55 PM To: IALSA/ialsa-2016-groningen ialsa-2016-groningen@noreply.github.com Subject: [IALSA/ialsa-2016-groningen] harmonize: HEALTH (#16)
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/IALSA/ialsa-2016-groningen/issues/16
view information at https://g2aging.org/index.php?section=module&moduleid=1260&display=
poor_health
levels:
alsa - HLTHLIFE
lsls - SRHEALTH = still use good
satsa - GGENHLTH
share - PH0020, PH0030
tilda - PH001
Comments on harmonization algorithms:
moderately good
was classified as poor_health
=TRUE
NA
on the primary variable PH0020
. In those cases, the value of PH0030
was used. (this needs verification with respect to the specific question of PH0030
.
descriptives for HEALTH