Open jkikstra opened 2 weeks ago
Note that #188 already implements a few, but kept it to
Maybe we want multiple labels?
Note: also consider labels for:
N.B. this would be quick an escalation of the column names - not sure how the admins would feel about it. At the same time, it could clarify things quite a bit for the modelers.
Opening this issue to keep track of it.
Would be useful to have IPCC sector labelling in the emissions variables.
I would suggest to have this as a (i.e., one) meta column, with IPCC categories specified as a string. This is not perfectly machine-readable, but a step forward from only having it in the variable definition string. Perhaps best done following EDGAR reporting style, to enable string matching, like:
h/t @OFR-IIASA
The 2019 refinement to the 2006 reporting guidance that we can base it on is here: https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2019rf/pdf/1_Volume1/19R_V1_Ch08_Reporting_Guidance.pdf
For a quick (but non-authorative?) overview of how to map 1996 to 2006, see slide 17 of: https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/1_1996_to_2006_lesotho_march_2016_final_kt.pdf
(please do say so if there's any better source to base it on)