Open gidden opened 3 months ago
Thanks @gidden!
I think there are three options.
First option:
Or include 3 always with 2 (which is your initial proposal, if I understand it correctly) - then you should also update the DAC description
Or split 3 between 1 and 2 based on shares - and you should also clarify the DAC description accordingly.
@jayfuhrman re-pinging you on this. any further thoughts on energy variables?
FYI @strefler @jayfuhrman @danielhuppmann
Are we ok with just one FE CCS variable? There is a bit of overlap with DAC here. I would say energy for purely the capture of DAC go into the DAC variable, but transportation and storage energy (if modeled) go into CCS.