Closed danielhuppmann closed 9 months ago
Attention: 1 lines
in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.
Comparison is base (
d1cd1f7
) 94.7% compared to head (a2fefa9
) 94.7%.
Files | Patch % | Lines |
---|---|---|
pyam/validation.py | 96.0% | 1 Missing :warning: |
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Thanks @phackstock - implemented your suggestion for upper_bound
and lower_bound
, but I don't think that checking deprecation-warnings is worth the effort...
Please confirm that this PR has done the following:
Description of PR
This PR extends the signature of the
validate()
method to take filter-arguments directly instead of using a (nested) dictionary, socan now be called as
This allows to validate only a selection of the datapoints, e.g., filtered by region or model/scenario name. The signature can also more easily be called from a (to-be-implemented) processor in the nomenclature package.
The option to use nested dicts is marked as deprecated with release 3.0.