Open danielhuppmann opened 9 months ago
Sure, this seems safe to do. A clean way would be to extend SPECIES
with:
That would result in the constructed pattern looking and working something like this: https://regex101.com/r/pQ2Kf3/1
~Note that the order of (1) and (2) matters.~ Maybe it doesn't, but please check.
Please also add a comment above these two elements at the bottom of the list to explain the distinction.
While working on some sanity-checks for the new IAMC project templates, I realized that several emissions species are relevant for IAM reporting but are not included in the list of emissions - because they are not greenhouse gases.
I suggest to add them anyway here so that pyam and a unit-validation-schema can directly build on ism-units (instead of requiring a separate solution).
I was trying to use the following line to check whether a unit like "Mt BC/yr" is valid.
This fails for the following emissions species: BC, CO, NH3, NO2, OC, SO2, VOC, HFC43-10
Of course, trying to convert them using GWP should (continue to) fail.
Any objections @khaeru @phackstock?