Code Lists - Review of Code List 1.36

[lambertciata]

Code List 1.36 only has "Airline" as a role and not "Carrier" for instance. It is required to review the usage of this code list for the Roles or to assess if UNCEFACT list is a better fit.

See: https://vocabulary.uncefact.org/PartyRoleCodeList

[lambertciata]

After a first review of the UNCEFACT Role Code List and comparison with Code List 1.36 there are:

Code List 1.36 elements --- UNCEFACT Roles

• [ ] Airline AIR --- Carrier CA (no specific Airline identifier)
• [ ] Airport Authority APT --- No specific to airport but Port authority POA
• [x] Agent AGT --- Agent AG
• [x] Broker BRK --- Broker or sales office BO
• [x] Commissionable Agent CAG --- Commissionable agent CY
• [x] Consignee CNE --- Consignee CN
• [x] Customs CTM --- Customs CM
• [x] Declarant DCL --- Declarant DT
• [x] Deconsolidator DEC --- Deconsolidator DC
• [x] Freight Forwarder FFW --- Freight Forwarder FW
• [ ] Ground Handling Agent GHA --- No specific element
• [ ] Post Office PTT --- No specific element
• [x] Shipper SHP --- Shipper DEQ
• [ ] Trucker TRK --- Road Carrier GA ?

Open question: Can we find a mapping with missing elements? If not can we assess their usage?

[NiclasScheiber]

Another possibility would be to declare in the ontology that both IATA codes and the ones provided by UNCEFACT are valid, but for an Air Waybill, the ones from IATA must be used?

[YewKong]

Should we add in one more role for 'NOTIFY PARTY'? This role is explicitly specified in FWB.