I was using xmltompc80col.py to convert ADES xml to what becomes 2-line observations in the 80-col format, and it looks like there's an issue when the xml has observatory coordinates with extra precision. It seems these are not truncated during the conversion to 80-col, so that for example
<optical><trkSub>MYDESIG</trkSub><mode>CMO</mode><stn>246</stn><sys>ICRF_AU</sys><ctr>10</ctr><pos1>-0.6341405090</pos1><pos2>0.6812469710</pos2><pos3>0.2952090970</pos3><obsTime>2024-01-31T12:48:41.616Z</obsTime><ra>21.63341</ra><dec>-30.11656</dec><rmsRA>0.6361</rmsRA><rmsDec>0.5936</rmsDec><rmsCorr>-0.0836</rmsCorr><astCat>Gaia3</astCat><remarks>this is a test</remarks></optical>
I was using xmltompc80col.py to convert ADES xml to what becomes 2-line observations in the 80-col format, and it looks like there's an issue when the xml has observatory coordinates with extra precision. It seems these are not truncated during the conversion to 80-col, so that for example
<optical>
<trkSub>MYDESIG</trkSub>
<mode>CMO</mode>
<stn>246</stn>
<sys>ICRF_AU</sys>
<ctr>10</ctr>
<pos1>-0.6341405090</pos1>
<pos2>0.6812469710</pos2>
<pos3>0.2952090970</pos3>
<obsTime>2024-01-31T12:48:41.616Z</obsTime>
<ra>21.63341</ra>
<dec>-30.11656</dec>
<rmsRA>0.6361</rmsRA>
<rmsDec>0.5936</rmsDec>
<rmsCorr>-0.0836</rmsCorr>
<astCat>Gaia3</astCat>
<remarks>this is a test</remarks>
</optical>
becomes
MYDESIG S2024 01 31.53381501 26 32.018-30 06 59.62 W 246
MYDESIG s2024 01 31.5338152 -0.6341405090 +0.6812469710 +0.2952090970 246
with an extra long 2nd line.
I've attached a sample xml with the above, and the obs80 output from xmltompc80col.py (Github forced me to add .txt as extension).
testxml.obs.txt test.xml.txt