Hi - I'm trying to incorporate jt400 in a .NET app via IKVM, and a potential issue was identified regarding the maven dependencies in this project.
The original discussion can be found here: https://github.com/ikvmnet/ikvm-maven/discussions/64; but the upshot is it's unclear why maven-antrun-plugin is a dependency for the published jar. It looks like it's only used for various build tasks, rather than an actual runtime dependency which is what a provided scope would imply. Is that correct? If so, any chance the build step could be split up/re-arranged to make importing jt400 simpler?
Hi - I'm trying to incorporate
jt400in a .NET app via IKVM, and a potential issue was identified regarding the maven dependencies in this project.The original discussion can be found here: https://github.com/ikvmnet/ikvm-maven/discussions/64; but the upshot is it's unclear why
maven-antrun-pluginis a dependency for the published jar. It looks like it's only used for various build tasks, rather than an actual runtime dependency which is what aprovidedscope would imply. Is that correct? If so, any chance the build step could be split up/re-arranged to make importingjt400simpler?