Open gyliu513 opened 3 years ago
My major concern is the open source community may have some concern as we already have https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-ibmcloud in kubernetes sigs, so the community may have question why not using one repo to handle all IBM Cloud.
I agree with @gyliu513 that we should keep everything under the community repo. My understanding is this repo is for POC (if not, we should keep that way) and we will be moving the code to the community repo soon we can.
@gyliu513 @spzala It makes sense. We can put IBM VPC gen2 infrastructure, IBM classic infrastructure, PowerVS and maybe other types of iaas into cluster-api-provider-ibmcloud. And also we can build our kubeadmcontrolplane to bootstrap IKS rather than only vanilla k8s.
@wentao-zh awesome, thanks!
@wentao-zh cluster api version for ibmcloud is very low https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-ibmcloud/blob/master/go.mod#L16 , this needs to be updated. It may request some SL knowledge as well.
We already have a repo at https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-ibmcloud for IBM SoftLayer, maybe we can consider if this one can be merged togethers into same repo as https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-ibmcloud
@wentao-zh ^^