Closed abmusse closed 8 years ago
Original comment by Tony Cairns (Bitbucket: rangercairns, GitHub: rangercairns).
Yes. We are using AIX RPMs, Perzl, AIX Toolbox. Sometimes just easier to go with flow of AIX.
#!shell
Create a group profile(s):
CRTUSRPRF USRPRF(SYSTEM) PASSWORD(*NONE) USRCLS(*SYSOPR) TEXT('AIX rpm group') SPCAUT(*USRCLS) GID(*GEN) AUT(*ALL)
CRTUSRPRF USRPRF(BIN) PASSWORD(*NONE) USRCLS(*SYSOPR) TEXT('AIX rpm group') SPCAUT(*USRCLS) GID(*GEN) AUT(*ALL)
Note: You may choose authorization settings.
This is optional. Install rpm message is not fatal installing AIX RPMs on IBM i. Also, not an issue for folks that use IBM i only RPMs, PTFs, etc. However, personally, i am in favour of joining larger community of AIX RPMs, widen our IBM i pond of RPM resources beyond our smaller IBM i community. All users will have to decide, but best to have options available.
Original comment by Aaron Bartell (Bitbucket: aaronbartell, GitHub: aaronbartell).
I realize this issue is closed but I wanted to document for those coming here after the fact.
Tony made this commit that addresses the issue by adding user profiles being looked for.
Original comment by Tony Cairns (Bitbucket: rangercairns, GitHub: rangercairns).
yep, just to record for later ... possibly scsan/filter on fly using stderr redirect 2>&1, but again low priority (me thinks).
Original comment by Aaron Bartell (Bitbucket: aaronbartell, GitHub: aaronbartell).
The only way I can think to turn it off would be to route it to a temp file, sanitize for messages we don't want to see, and then put the sanitized result back to stdout. I am not a huge fan of this approach. I think this is a very low priority given its complications.
Original comment by Tony Cairns (Bitbucket: rangercairns, GitHub: rangercairns).
i not sure silence is golden ... not easy to turn off, AIX binaries with AIX group thinking we force onto PASE. I am thinking no action here, unless better case made.
Original comment by Aaron Bartell (Bitbucket: aaronbartell, GitHub: aaronbartell).
Nevermind. I tried taking the -v
option off rpm
and it didn't remove the group system does not exist - using root
messages and instead only altered the hash logging to omit the name of the package being installed.
Closing issue.
Original comment by Aaron Bartell (Bitbucket: aaronbartell, GitHub: aaronbartell).
Maybe we could add a verbose on/off option to chroot_setup.sh and pkg_setup.sh?
Original comment by Tony Cairns (Bitbucket: rangercairns, GitHub: rangercairns).
Dunno. Sort of a verbose or not (eye of beholder). BTW -- i am out this afternoon, back tomorrow, then out next week.
Original report by Aaron Bartell (Bitbucket: aaronbartell, GitHub: aaronbartell).
Seeing a lot of these because of the
-v
option on therpm
command (hundreds on the git install).Am wondering if we should remove the
-v
option and just stick with-hU
which still gives us the name of the rpm being installed (with hash progress). I am assuming errors would still be communicated even without-v
being specified.Thoughts?