Open tyleryasaka opened 6 years ago
Yes. supporting the DID spec is part of the plan, thank you for articulating this here.
I have just been getting versed in much of the DID spec work and various efforts around it. I have a very rudimentary data object right now that collects the hashed pub key, 'peerId', arbitrary namehandle
, public key and a set of signed proofs are locally stored, but it does need to be interoperable with other systems.
Wanted to reference @jonnycrunch's https://github.com/jonnycrunch/ipid here as the general concept to follow also, this looks like an expansion: https://github.com/ipfs-shipyard/peer-star/blob/rfc-identity/docs/rfc-identity.md
For context, I'm referring to the Decentralized Identifiers (DIDs) spec. https://w3c-ccg.github.io/did-spec/
Probably a bit early, but I think it's worth mentioning: would be great if this could be defined as a formal DID method.
I would be glad to help make this happen.
One example of a DID method: https://github.com/WebOfTrustInfo/rebooting-the-web-of-trust-spring2018/blob/master/topics-and-advance-readings/DID-Method-erc725.md
Current list of DID methods: https://w3c-ccg.github.io/did-method-registry/