Is your feature request related to a problem? Describe the feature request.
We believe that the vulnerability advisor policy type is counterproductive because
It prevents images with fewer but not zero vulnerabilities from being deployed.
1.1 although remaining vulnerabilities can be exempted this is also undesirable because IBM VA exemptions do not have expiry dates so cant be considered temporary
Can "break production" because a live image can have vulnerabilities found which make id denied
IBM Cloud VA is revising the api with v4 available now on opt in which we do not plan to support from Portieris.
Describe the solution that you'd like
Recognising that this is a breaking change, remove support to VA policies in a new minor revision.
Policies with the vulnerability option will cause image denial with a suitable message.
In a follow up breaking change we expect to revise the polocy schema to remove the vulnerability option.
Describe alternatives you've considered
Continue to maintain support for v4 and beyond, discounted for reasons 1 and 2 above, possible but not desirable.
Additional context
Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Describe the feature request. We believe that the vulnerability advisor policy type is counterproductive because
Describe the solution that you'd like Recognising that this is a breaking change, remove support to VA policies in a new minor revision. Policies with the vulnerability option will cause image denial with a suitable message.
In a follow up breaking change we expect to revise the polocy schema to remove the vulnerability option.
Describe alternatives you've considered Continue to maintain support for v4 and beyond, discounted for reasons 1 and 2 above, possible but not desirable.
Additional context Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request.