Closed bpradipt closed 4 years ago
Before reporting an issue, check our backlog of open issues to see if someone else has already reported it. If so, feel free to add your scenario, or additional information, to the discussion. Or simply "subscribe" to it to be notified when it is updated. If you find a new issue with the project we'd love to hear about it! The most important aspect of a bug report is that it includes enough information for us to reproduce it. So, please include as much detail as possible and try to remove the extra stuff that doesn't really relate to the issue itself. The easier it is for us to reproduce it, the faster it'll be fixed! Please don't include any private/sensitive information in your issue!
No Pull Request (PR) is too small! Typos, additional comments in the code, new testcases, bug fixes, new features, more documentation, ... it's all welcome! While bug fixes can first be identified via an "issue", that is not required. It's ok to just open up a PR with the fix, but make sure you include the same information you would have included in an issue - like how to reproduce it. PRs for new features should include some background on what use cases the new code is trying to address. When possible and when it makes sense, try to break-up larger PRs into smaller ones - it's easier to review smaller code changes. But only if those smaller ones make sense as stand-alone PRs. Regardless of the type of PR, all PRs should include:
PRs that fix issues should include a reference like Closes #XXXX in the commit message so that github will automatically close the referenced issue when the PR is merged.
All the repositories accept contributions via GitHub Pull requests (PR). Submit PRs by following the GitHub workflow.
To get started, complete the prerequisites below.
Review Contributor roles that require special Git configuration.
Note: The email address you specify must match the email address you use to sign-off commits.
Fork and Clone the relevant repository at the Raksh Project.
Example: Your local clone should show your-github-username
, as follows.
https://github.com/${your-github-username}/community
.
Special Git configuration is required for these contributors:
For all other contributor roles, follow the standard configuration, shown in Prerequisites.
Golang
errors.gofmt
to fix any mechanical style issues.In order to add or update a dependency to this project run:
> export GO111MODULE=on
> go get -u [DEPENDENCY]
Since RAKSH uses go modules we highly recommend reading the go modules wiki, especially the daily workflow section. To ensure the working directory contains all necessary files afterwards, run:
> make vendor
In order to get a clear contribution chain of trust we use the signed-off-by language used by the Linux kernel project.
Raise a GitHub issue before starting work on a PR.
Our process requires an issue to be associated with every PR (see patch format)
If you are a new contributor, create an issue and add a comment stating that you intend to work on the issue. This notifies our team of the work you plan to do.
To report a bug that is not already documented, please open a GitHub issue for the repository in question.
If it is unclear which repository to raise your query against, first try to get in contact with us. If in doubt, raise the issue here and we will help you to handle the query by routing it to the correct area for resolution.
Our tooling requires adding a Fixes
comment to at least one commit in the PR, which triggers GitHub to automatically close the issue once the PR is merged:
pod: Remove token from Cmd structure
The token and pid data will be hold by the new Process structure and
they are related to a container.
Fixes #123
Signed-off-by: Sebastien Boeuf <sebastien.boeuf@intel.com>
The issue is automatically closed by GitHub when the commit message is parsed.
Raksh employs certain augmentations to a standard GitHub workflow. In this section, we explain these augmentations in more detail. Follow these guidelines when contributing to Kata Containers repositories, except where noted below.
Complete the GitHub basic setup above before continuing.
Ensure each PR only covers one topic. If you mix up different items in your patches or PR, they will likely need to be reworked.
Follow a topic branch method for development.
Follow carefully the patch format for PRs.
Apply the appropriate GitHub labels to your PR. This is particularly relevant to maintain Stable branch backports. See also GitHub labels and keywords that block PRs
Note: External contributors should use keywords, explained in the link above. Labels may not be visible to external contributors.
Rebase
commits on your branch and force push
after each cycle of feedback.
Most Raksh repository
contain code written in the Go language (golang). Go
requires all code to be put inside the directory specified by the $GOPATH
variable. Follow this example to put the code in the standard location.
$ export GOPATH=${GOPATH:-$HOME/go}
$ mkdir -p "$GOPATH"
Note: If you intend to make minor edits, it's acceptable to simply fork and clone without adding the GOPATH variable.
In this example, we configure a Git environment to contribute to this very
Community
repo. We create a sample branch, incorporate reviewer feedback, and rebase our commits.
Fork the upstream repository:
While on your forked copy, select the green button Clone or download
and copy the URL.
Run the commands below and paste the copied URL (previous step),
so your real GitHub user name replaces your-github-username
below.
$ mkdir -p $GOPATH/src/github.com/ibm
$ cd $GOPATH/src/github.com/ibm
$ git clone https://github.com/ibm/raksh.git
$ git checkout -b 1.9.1-raksh origin/1.9.1-raksh
Note: Cloning a forked repository automatically gives a remote
origin
.
Create a new "topic branch" to do your work on:
$ git checkout -b fix-contrib-bugs
Warning: Never make changes directly to the
master
branch --always create a new "topic branch" for PR work.
Make some editorial changes. In this example, we modify the file that you are reading.
$ $EDITOR CONTRIBUTING.md
Commit your changes to the current (fix-contrib-bugs
) branch. Assure
you use the correct patch format:
$ git commit -as
Push your local fix-contrib-bugs
branch to your remote fork:
$ git push -u origin fix-contrib-bugs
Note: The
-u
option tellsgit
to "link" your local clone with your remote fork so that it knows from now on that the local repository and the remote fork refer to "the same" upstream repository. Strictly speaking, this option is only required the first time you callgit push
for a new clone.
Create the PR:
Note: You do not need to change any of the defaults on this page.
Suppose you received some reviewer feedback that asked you to make some changes to your PR. You updated your local branch and committed those review changes by creating three commits. There are now four commits in your local branch: the original commit you created for the PR and three other commits you created to apply the review changes to your branch. Your branch now looks something like this:
$ git log master.. --oneline --decorate=no
4928d57 docs: Fix typos and fold long lines
829c6c8 apply review feedback changes
7c9b1b2 remove blank lines
60e2b2b doh - missed one
Note: The
git log
command compares your current branch (fix-contrib-bugs
) with themaster
branch and lists all the commits, one per line.
Since all four commits are related to the same change, it makes sense to combine all four commits into a single commit on your PR. You need to git rebase multiple commits on your branch. Follow these steps.
Update the master
branch in your local copy of the upstream
repository:
$ cd $GOPATH/src/github.com/IBM/raksh
$ git checkout master
$ git pull --rebase upstream master
The previous command downloads all the latest changes from the upstream repository and adds them to your local copy.
Now, switch back to your PR branch:
$ git checkout fix-contrib-bugs
Rebase your changes against the master
branch.
$ git rebase -i master
Example output:
pick 2e335ac docs: Fix typos and fold long lines
pick 6d6deb0 apply review feedback changes
pick 23bc01d remove blank lines
pick 3a4ba3f doh - missed one
In your editor, read the comments at the bottom of the screen.
Do not modify the first line, pick 2e335ac docs: Fix typos ...
. Instead, revise pick
to squash
at the start of all following lines.
Example output:
pick 2e335ac docs: Fix typos and fold long lines
squash 6d6deb0 apply review feedback changes
squash 23bc01d remove blank lines
squash 3a4ba3f doh - missed one
Save your changes and quit the editor. Git puts you back into your editor. You will see all the commit messages.
At top is your first commit, which should be in the correct format. Keep your first commit and delete all the following commits, as appropriate, based on the review feedback.
Save the file and quit the editor. Once this operation completes, the four
commits will have been converted into a single new commit. Check this by
running the git log
command again:
$ git log master.. --oneline --decorate=no
3ea3aef docs: Fix typo
Force push your updated local fix-contrib-bugs
branch to origin
remote:
$ git push -f origin fix-contrib-bugs
Note: Not only does this command upload your changes to your fork, it also includes the latest upstream changes to your fork since you ran
git pull --rebase upstream master
on the master branch and then merged those changes into your PR branch. This ensures your fork is now "up to date" with the upstream repository. The-f
option is a "force push". Since you created a new commit usinggit rebase
, you must "overwrite" the old copy of your branch in your fork on GitHub.
Your PR is now updated on GitHub. To ensure team members are aware of this, leave a message on the PR stating something like, "Review feedback applied". This notification allows the team to once again review your PR more quickly.
There are two methods that allow marking PRs to prevent them being merged. This practice is often used during development. The two methods are: 1) Use GitHub labels or; 2) Use keywords in the PR subject line. The keywords can appear anywhere in the subject line.
The following table summarises some common scenarios and appropriate use of labels or keywords:
Scenario | GitHub label | PR description contains |
---|---|---|
PR created "as an idea" and feedback sought | rfc |
RFC |
PR incomplete - needs more work or rework | do-not-merge wip |
WIP |
PR should not be merged (has all required "acks", but needs more reviewer input) | do-not-merge |
|
PR is a "work In progress", raised to get early feedback | wip |
WIP |
PR is complete but depends on another so should not be merged (yet) | do-not-merge |
If any of the values in the table above are set on a PR, it will be automatically blocked from merging.
Note: Often during discussions, the abbreviated and full terms are used interchangeably. For instance, often
DNM
is used in discussions as shorthand fordo-not-merge
. The CI systems only recognise the above phrases as shown.
The sign-off is a line at the end of the explanation for the patch. Your signature certifies that you wrote the patch or otherwise have the right to pass it on as an open-source patch. The rules are simple: if you can certify the below (from developercertificate.org):
Developer Certificate of Origin
Version 1.1
Copyright (C) 2004, 2006 The Linux Foundation and its contributors.
660 York Street, Suite 102,
San Francisco, CA 94110 USA
Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies of this
license document, but changing it is not allowed.
Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1
By making a contribution to this project, I certify that:
(a) The contribution was created in whole or in part by me and I
have the right to submit it under the open source license
indicated in the file; or
(b) The contribution is based upon previous work that, to the best
of my knowledge, is covered under an appropriate open source
license and I have the right under that license to submit that
work with modifications, whether created in whole or in part
by me, under the same open source license (unless I am
permitted to submit under a different license), as indicated
in the file; or
(c) The contribution was provided directly to me by some other
person who certified (a), (b) or (c) and I have not modified
it.
(d) I understand and agree that this project and the contribution
are public and that a record of the contribution (including all
personal information I submit with it, including my sign-off) is
maintained indefinitely and may be redistributed consistent with
this project or the open source license(s) involved.
Then you just add a line to every git commit message:
Signed-off-by: Joe Smith joe.smith@email.com
Use your real name (sorry, no pseudonyms or anonymous contributions.)
If you set your user.name
and user.email
git configs, you can sign your
commit automatically with git commit -s
.
Raksh maintains a number of stable branch releases. Bug fixes to the master branch are selectively applied to (or "backported") these stable branches.
In order to aid identification of commits that potentially should be
backported to the stable branches, all PRs submitted must be labeled with
one or more of the following labels. At least one label that is not
stable-candidate
must be included.
Label | Meaning |
---|---|
bug |
A bug fix, which will potentially be a backport candidate |
cleanup |
A cleanup, which will likely not be backported |
feature |
A new feature/enhancement, that will likely not be backported |
stable-candidate |
A PR selected for backporting - very likely a bug fix |
vendor |
A golang vendor update. Might be considered for backport if the vendor update includes critical bug fixes |
In the event that a bug fix PR is selected for backporting to the stable
branches, the stable-candidate
label is added if not already present, and
the original author of the PR is asked if they will submit the relevant
backport PRs.
Beside the Signed-off-by
footer, we expect each patch to comply with the
following format:
subsystem: One line change summary
More detailed explanation of your changes (why and how)
that spans as many lines as required.
A "Fixes #XXX" comment listing the GitHub issue this change resolves.
This comment is required for the main patch in a sequence. See the following examples.
Signed-off-by: <contributor@foo.com>
As shown above, pull requests must adhere to these guidelines:
Preface the PR title with the appropriate keyword found in Subsystem
Ensure PR title length is 75 characters or fewer, including whichever
subsystem
term is used.
Ensure the PR body line length is 72 characters or fewer.
The body of the message is not a continuation of the subject line and is not used to extend the subject line beyond its character limit. The subject line is a complete sentence and the body is a complete, standalone paragraph.
The "subsystem" describes the area of the code that the change applies to. It does not have to match a particular directory name in the source tree because it is a "hint" to the reader. The subsystem is generally a single word. Although the subsystem must be specified, it is not validated. The author decides what is a relevant subsystem for each patch.
Examples:
Subsystem | Description |
---|---|
build |
Makefile or configuration script change |
cli |
Change affecting command line options or commands |
docs |
Documentation change |
logging |
Logging change |
vendor |
Re-vendoring change |
To see the subsystem values chosen for existing commits:
$ git log --no-merges --pretty="%s" | cut -d: -f1 | sort -u
We recommend that each patch fixes one thing. Smaller patches are easier to review, more likely to be accepted and merged, and more conducive for identifying problems during review.
A PR can contain multiple patches. These patches should generally be related to the main patch and the overall goal of the PR. However, it is also acceptable to include additional or supplementary patches for things such as:
The following is an example of a full patch description for the main change that shows the required "Fixes #XXX
" comment, which references the GitHub issue this patch resolves:
pod: Remove token from Cmd structure
The token and pid data will be hold by the new Process structure and
they are related to a container.
Fixes: #123
Signed-off-by: Sebastien Boeuf <sebastien.boeuf@intel.com>
If a PR contains multiple patches, only one of those patches needs to specify the "Fixes #XXX
" comment. Supplementary patches have an identical format to the main patch, but do not need to specify a "Fixes #XXX
"
comment.
Example:
image-builder: Fix incorrect error message
Fixed an error message which was referring to an incorrect rootfs
variable name.
Signed-off-by: James O. D. Hunt <james.o.hunt@intel.com>
Before your PRs are merged into the main code base, they are reviewed. We encourage anybody to review any PR and leave feedback.
See the PR review guide for tips on performing a careful review.
We use the GitHub Required Reviews system for reviewers to note if they agree or disagree with a PR. To have an acknowledgment or "nack" registered with GitHub, you must use the GitHub "Review changes" dialog to leave feedback. Notes left only in the comments fields, whilst sometimes useful, will not get registered in the acknowledgment counting system.
The following is an example of a valid "ack", as long as the "Approve" box is ticked in the Review changes dialog:
Excellent work - thanks for your contribution.
lgtm
The Raksh project has a gating process to prevent introducing regressions. When your PR is submitted, a Continuous Integration (CI) system will run different checks on different platforms, based upon your changes.
Some of the checks are:
The Travis job will be executed right after the PR is opened, while the
Jenkins jobs will wait to be triggered. A maintainer must add a /test
comment on the PR to let the CI jobs run.
All CI jobs must pass in order to merge your PR.
Get an invite to our Slack channel, and then join us on Slack #raksh
The Raksh project maintainers are the people accepting or rejecting any PR. Although anyone can review PRs, only the acknowledgement (or "ack") from an Approver counts towards the approval of a PR.
Approvers are listed in GitHub teams, one for each repository. The project
uses the
GitHub required status checks
along with the GitHub CODEOWNERS
file to specify who can approve PRs. All repositories are configured to require:
Two approvals from the repository-specific approval team.
One documentation team approval if the PR modifies documentation.
Contrib guide added. Closing this issue
This task is to create a Contribution guide for the Raksh project.