Closed bentcoder closed 1 week ago
Because this library uses async for sync under the hood! https://github.com/IBM/sarama/discussions/2912#discussioncomment-9555131
Thank you for taking the time to raise this issue. However, it has not had any activity on it in the past 90 days and will be closed in 30 days if no updates occur. Please check if the main branch has already resolved the issue since it was raised. If you believe the issue is still valid and you would like input from the maintainers then please comment to ask for it to be reviewed.
Hi,
I thought the throughput would be better for async operations but for the given configurations, there is barely any difference at all between sync (30932 requests) and async (31274 requests) producers. Testing with 99 virtual users sending concurrent requests for 10 seconds to both endpoints. Topic has 3 partitions on a single broker.
Am I using producers wrong or, is it a configuration issue, or is there a bug in the library?
Thanks
SYNC
ASYNC