codecov[bot]
commented
1 year ago Codecov Report
Patch coverage: 100.00% and project coverage change: +0.02 :tada:
Comparison is base (
e5e0c7f) 92.81% compared to head (6357a63) 92.83%.
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #55 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 92.81% 92.83% +0.02% ========================================== Files 73 73 Lines 3034 3043 +9 ========================================== + Hits 2816 2825 +9 Misses 218 218 ``` | [Impacted Files](https://app.codecov.io/gh/IBM/zshot/pull/55?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=IBM) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [zshot/linker/linker\_regen/linker\_regen.py](https://app.codecov.io/gh/IBM/zshot/pull/55?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=IBM#diff-enNob3QvbGlua2VyL2xpbmtlcl9yZWdlbi9saW5rZXJfcmVnZW4ucHk=) | `98.50% <100.00%> (+0.20%)` | :arrow_up: | | [zshot/linker/linker\_smxm.py](https://app.codecov.io/gh/IBM/zshot/pull/55?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=IBM#diff-enNob3QvbGlua2VyL2xpbmtlcl9zbXhtLnB5) | `96.66% <100.00%> (+0.11%)` | :arrow_up: | | [zshot/tests/linker/test\_tars\_linker.py](https://app.codecov.io/gh/IBM/zshot/pull/55?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=IBM#diff-enNob3QvdGVzdHMvbGlua2VyL3Rlc3RfdGFyc19saW5rZXIucHk=) | `95.00% <100.00%> (ø)` | | | [...mentions\_extractor/test\_tars\_mentions\_extractor.py](https://app.codecov.io/gh/IBM/zshot/pull/55?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=IBM#diff-enNob3QvdGVzdHMvbWVudGlvbnNfZXh0cmFjdG9yL3Rlc3RfdGFyc19tZW50aW9uc19leHRyYWN0b3IucHk=) | `93.54% <100.00%> (ø)` | |:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.
Problem
Add Softmax scores to Regen spans
Closes #54