Closed wmarshall484 closed 7 years ago
I'll recreate them elsewhere, but they definitely don't belong in rest.py. I'm thinking about where to put them. Since these were created with Jupyter visualization in mind, maybe something like streamsx.jupyter
or streamsx.jupyter_viz
I guess for backwards compat we just say they have moved, since they probably didn't have widespread usage yet.
In commit 032694e I separated the threading logic from the view object. Hopefully it should be more clear.
Will the topology api code call into the rest code to obtain the vcap services info, rather than having two copies of the code?
@ddebrunner, that's a good question. Having the topology api code call the rest code to obtain the vcap services info reduces duplication at the cost of higher coupling.
Right now the topology api only depends on the rest api when views are present. If we make this change, the topology api will depend on the rest api whenever vcap services are supplied.
On the other hand, it is a lot of duplicated code.
What's happening to the
multi_graph_every
functions? Just being deleted or will they be recreated elsewhere?