Open philljenkins opened 1 day ago
It's not clear why its reported to ACT as "inapplicable", while running the Checker browser extension flags it as a Violation
Failed Example 4: https://www.w3.org/WAI/content-assets/wcag-act-rules/testcases/b33eff/8f341a73c698daf157613c32a521878ed5aa7310.html
[31m--Expected failed, but returned earl:inapplicable
Failures: []
Review: []
Pass: []
All: [
"html_skipnav_exists:Potential_1:POTENTIAL",
"style_highcontrast_visible:Manual_1:MANUAL",
"skip_main_exists:Fail_1:FAIL"
]
The element <html> is restricted to either landscape or portrait orientation using CSS transform property
<html lang="en">
Checker rule element_orientation_unlocked reports inconsistent with ACT rule(s) below:
pass, fail_locked
.Reference