Open paulstapor opened 7 years ago
Currently, these are structs, but in most routines, we ask for the existence of specific fields and test then is they are empty. Classes would make this much nicer.
Is this still an issue?
Yes, for future discussion.
There's also a different milestone for this: the "object orientation" milestone, e.g. Pesto rel. 1.1., so to speak
Currently, these are structs, but in most routines, we ask for the existence of specific fields and test then is they are empty. Classes would make this much nicer.