search

ICPI / DIV

Organizational Material
10 stars 2 forks source link

Question on has_modality Flag for CHIPS Tool in Pano #94

Closed bowdenj closed 4 years ago

bowdenj commented 6 years ago

@shazadahmed10 - A question came up from Derek and the Pano team about the CHIPS tool using our new flag structure seen in the MER Structured Datasets.

For 2016, we should not have a Y in "has_modality" for both "ServiceDeliveryPoint/Result" and also "ServiceDeliveryPoint." Which of the below two options would you recommend for 2016 results?

  1. ServiceDeliveryPoint/Result should have has_modality = With Result
  2. ServiceDeliveryPoint should have has_modality = Without Result

Please let me know if this question doesn't make sense or could be asked differently. FYI @pvinayak001 this is a cross-over from https://github.com/pepfar-datim/Analytics-ETL/issues/56

shazadahmed10 commented 6 years ago

Hi @bowdenj - apologies, could you ask this differently? i guess i;m just having trouble understanding what the two options are trying to convey.

Feel free to call me: 202-663-1265

arcann commented 5 years ago

We're asking which of the two disaggregates should be used as the primary source for Modality level results. The primary source is tagged with has_modality = Y.

Option 1 would make ServiceDeliveryPoint the primary, and ServiceDeliveryPoint/Result would be tagged with has_modality = With Result meaning it should only be used if report users want Modality and Result. By default, reports would use ServiceDeliveryPoint

Option 2 would make ServiceDeliveryPoint/Result the primary, and ServiceDeliveryPoint would be tagged with has_modality = Without Result meaning it should only be used if report users specifically want that no-results disagg. By default, reports would use ServiceDeliveryPoint/Result

arcann commented 5 years ago

This question applies only to 2016 results.

arcann commented 5 years ago

For 2017, our plan is to use the MCAD disaggs as the primary source. For 2018 there is no duplication, so no issue.

shapaklyak commented 5 years ago

@shazadahmed10 is this resolved?

pvinayak001 commented 5 years ago

@shazadahmed10 Is this resolved or OBE?

oharasl commented 4 years ago

Accidentally closed, but may be good to revisit what if anything needs to be done between the MER 2.0 "Service Delivery" modalities and MER 2.1+ current modalities. DAQ Agenda item?