search

ICPI / VL_Tool_FY18

0 stars 0 forks source link

Feedback from QC on Nov 20: review of TX_PVLS, TX_RET, PMTCT_ART, SC_STOCK #17

Open cnichols3h opened 5 years ago

cnichols3h commented 5 years ago

I QC'd the Lab tool with a DATIM Genie data extract for Ethiopia. I checked the OU, partner and SNU levels. Here is the feedback by tab. TAB 1, Data completeness review = all clear ; all data points matched TAB 2, Viral load performance tab = all data points matched except for:

  1. Status of Scale-Up: Routine VL Monitoring: This visual states that it shows %s, but it shows numerical values for the disaggs. routine, targeted and undocumented. I also think the numerical values are counting these categories for both the numerator and denominator for TX_PVLS. Suggestion to choose either the numerator or denominator and show %s and the values or just the %s.
  2. Adults 25+ - VL Documentation & Outcomes, FY18 APR: I found higher values for VL documented and VL suppressed than are currently showing in the table. I will email the values. Suggestion to double check these. Suggestion to add 1 label to the legend that is currently missing ("VL suppressed"). Suggestion to align the x-axes for these age/sex graphs so they are easier to interpret; and are on the same horizontal line. Apart from these issues, all other values matched. Suggestions for next version of the tool (perhaps Q4c): make sure all #s are legible on the graphs for all slicer combinations (for ex., sometimes the #s overlap on the bar graphs and it's hard to read the values). Suggestion to number all graphs/charts/tables so that different audiences can quickly reference the same visuals when collectively looking at the Lab tool. Great work overall!!
Yabayabadoo commented 5 years ago

@cnichols3h Thank you for your QC and suggestions. Will definitely incorporate a numbering system in the next round.

anu87 commented 5 years ago

Thanks a lot, Catherine!