search

ICTU / DEI-SAP-POC

Real estate use case SSI exploration with DEI, SAP and ICTU
European Union Public License 1.2
0 stars 0 forks source link

As a PO I want the rules for real estate transaction testing available in a rules service API #3

Closed sgort closed 2 years ago

sgort commented 2 years ago

In #2 we specified test scenarios. For all those scenarios it is necessary to test the real estate transaction using a rule service API. Requirements:

sgort commented 2 years ago

High level collection of legal rules:

The largest common denominator of these rules is incorporated in the model purchase agreement.

sgort commented 2 years ago

A Carefree Real Estate (ie Dutch: Zorgeloos Vastgoed) project is underway in the Netherlands, commissioned by the Royal Notarial Professional Organization (KNB) with the following ambition: Unburden consumers when buying and selling real estate by improving cooperation as a chain.

The analysis there can be summarized as follows: To successfully complete a home purchase or sale, you basically need four 'green check marks': Buyer OK, Seller OK, Property OK and Financing OK. Underlying there are various actors in the chain that do their work on the basis of available data.

image

sgort commented 2 years ago

On the SAP side, this is the thought described in this week's sprint for now.

Frontend: Screens after clicking "Start Offer" button

1) click button "start offer" 2) new screen will show which contains a) loading indicator saying "getting verified information" b) page displays 4 checkboxes of information to be checked 1) Seller (give instant green check) 2) House (give instant green check) 3) Buyer (will not show instant check but show "waiting for response"). Here, buyer will get request in their SSI wallet to share information. Once they click "share" in wallet, a green checkmark is shown 4) Finance check (this will show "pending" until 3) has green check, because finance check can only be done with information of 3).

Once all 4 have green check we move to next screen to close deal (TBD how it looks)

sgort commented 2 years ago

See also #2 for criteria

sgort commented 2 years ago

We elaborate this in detail for all four checks in separate issues with a standard template:

  1. explanation based on legal framework of standards
  2. source and competent authority of required evidence for test criteria
  3. what additional and/or alternative is needed if 2 is missing or insufficient
  4. correction and/or improvement needed for 2 (or even 1) as a result of 3
sgort commented 2 years ago

Moved into an epic using Zenhub