search

ICTatRTI / coconut-mobile-plugin-zanzibar

Plugins added to Coconut Mobile for project specific features
Other
0 stars 0 forks source link

Issues for new questions #43

Open mikeymckay opened 5 years ago

mikeymckay commented 5 years ago

1. We have agreeded that, since we cannot confirm the if a patient was given treatment at HF but we can confirm how the drugs were prescribed (in the MCR/HMIS register) . Then the question of treatment given at the HF form should be changed to ”treatment prescribed” but should be “treatment given at Hiusehold” reason being DMSO can confirm is given at household level

  1. Lost to follow-up I think this question should be positive. What if we have it like “investigation status” options should be “investigated or Lost to follow-up”

Then, The question of reason of lost follow-up should have a skip if a case was selected as investigated

3. There is an error msg for household questionnaire on IRS in households part. If you pretest your will see it coming everytime

  1. The question which asking if household has been investigated for seven previous days? If you choose yes, we don't need to answer the following question (related to LLINs and IRS, (need to skip). To the questions asking abt malaria in past 30 days/month

5. In households members, we need to skip the following questions if we didn't manage to observe number of sleeping spaces in the households

6. We need to change the option in the LLINs observations: we need to have Yes all, Yes some and No

7. We are missing the question of coupons in the households, I think we had a questionthat DMSO to provided nouticr for Coupon for alalIN collection

8. We need the escape option after selecting unknown in the question asked if a visitor spent a night in the index case

8. We are missing the question of primaquine in the households level like what we had for HFs

~~9. The question of where the patient got an antimalarial, the DMSOs can select more then one option, (a situation like a patient vomited a tab and was also guven extra by DMSO at household level) therefore we need to have another option of both (HF and DMSO) but if this is selected then we need reason as text response . This is becouse the patient can receive dose twice(in facility and DMSOs). We need also to add question why DMSOs distributed dose to the patient while the same patient was treated already~~

mikeymckay commented 5 years ago
  1. Lost to follow-up I think this question should be positive. What if we have it like “investigation status” options should be “investigated or Lost to follow-up”

Then, The question of reason of lost follow-up should have a skip if a case was selected as investigated

We need this to be exhaustive. If we change it to investigation status, with the options "investigated" or "lost to followup" then we are missing the option of "in process of investigation". I think Lost To Followup is a well understood indicator. And this should remain as is.

mikeymckay commented 5 years ago
  1. The question which asking if household has been investigated for seven previous days? If you choose yes, we don't need to answer the following question (related to LLINs and IRS, (need to skip). To the questions asking abt malaria in past 30 days/month

Do you mean that if the house has been investigated we skip everything except for these final two questions:

↕ Has this household had a confirmed malaria household member(s) or visitor(s) (spent a night) in the last month (not including the last 7 days)? ↕ Date of last relevant contact with visitor(s)