Hello Mike, how are you, Sorry, today, I got another reminder from DMSOs that, for a house having two index cases, even if the other is selected as additional index case is till remaining and requesting for household investigation. I remembered we instructed them to mark as lost to follow-up but are still claiming but also I think it will mean something else. May show as if many case are lost to follow-up while is not a case. I think we need to think of a way to deactivate such a case from demanding HH investigation. One way is, on the system, to check if a case is marked as additional index case, matching an ID as given/reported by DMSO should automatically deactivated (not to acquire household data/investigation anymore) upon sending/getting/syncing data. I don't know how easy that would be but lets explore
Hello Mike, how are you, Sorry, today, I got another reminder from DMSOs that, for a house having two index cases, even if the other is selected as additional index case is till remaining and requesting for household investigation. I remembered we instructed them to mark as lost to follow-up but are still claiming but also I think it will mean something else. May show as if many case are lost to follow-up while is not a case. I think we need to think of a way to deactivate such a case from demanding HH investigation. One way is, on the system, to check if a case is marked as additional index case, matching an ID as given/reported by DMSO should automatically deactivated (not to acquire household data/investigation anymore) upon sending/getting/syncing data. I don't know how easy that would be but lets explore