Open lilyclements opened 4 days ago
@N-thony , could you please merge this PR, the updated function is needed in #9053
@N-thony , could you please merge this PR, the updated function is needed in #9053
@Vitalis95 I have already approved, we can merge this once @rdstern approves too.
@N-thony @Vitalis95 merging this in would mean the crops probabilities dialog does not work until the appropriate changes are made in the dialog. I suggest this not merged into the master branch but instead @Vitalis95 take over this branch and make in it your changes to the dialog
@lilyclements , I get the following error from this PR when importing data
We want to have the option to see the results with "Start Check" both TRUE and FALSE in the same table (as two columns)
This PR does this, so now
start_check
takes"yes"
,"no"
, and"both"
as arguments.start_check == "yes"
works howstart_check == TRUE
used to workstart_check == "no"
works howstart_check == FALSE
used to workstart_check == "both"
gives results forstart_check == TRUE
andstart_check == FALSE
. This therefore gives two columns - instead ofoverall_cond
, which is given for the above two options, this givesoverall_cond_with_start
andoverall_cond_no_start
.This is for use in EPICSA where we want to have stored a whole set of summaries to be calculable from a saved file (i.e., the resulting "crops_def" file here)
This is linked to issue #9052. I suggest that whoever implements #9052 reads in these changes (this should not be merged without amendments made to the dialog because of the changes in
start_check
)