Hi there,
I've noticed that some properties in apps4X can have two classes in the range. What we need to clarify in the semantic if we want to say that (i) they are intersections or (ii) unions
e.g: let's take the case of apps4x:consistsOf.
If the range is odapps:AppConcept OR odapps:Application, i think we might write the following axiom in the rdfs:range
apps4X:consistsOf a rdf:Property ;
rdfs:label "consists of" ;
rdfs:comment "A submission consists of " ;
rdfs:isDefinedBy <http://semweb.mmlab.be/ns/apps4X> ;
rdfs:domain apps4X:Submission ;
rdfs:range [ owl:unionOf (odapps:AppConcept odapps:Application) ] .
Hi there, I've noticed that some properties in apps4X can have two classes in the range. What we need to clarify in the semantic if we want to say that (i) they are intersections or (ii) unions e.g: let's take the case of apps4x:consistsOf. If the range is odapps:AppConcept OR odapps:Application, i think we might write the following axiom in the rdfs:range