The T-Tree 2.0 changed some physical aspects of the T-Tree 1.0. One of these changes was moving the Brain to the top of the tree, which had the unintended result of needing cables to be run up to the top. This can create strain on the cables and also looks bad.
For the next design (T-Tree 3.0?) we should reconsider where the Brain should be. Additionally, we need to think about how to incorporate the power supply so that it doesn't hang off the body of the T-Tree.
The smaller PVC diameter of the branches also leaves no wiggle room, which can create strain on the T-Sticks themselves. I think going back to the 3" PVC design for the branches would be a good way to go.
p42ul
commented
1 year ago
The T-Tree 2.0 changed some physical aspects of the T-Tree 1.0. One of these changes was moving the Brain to the top of the tree, which had the unintended result of needing cables to be run up to the top. This can create strain on the cables and also looks bad.
For the next design (T-Tree 3.0?) we should reconsider where the Brain should be. Additionally, we need to think about how to incorporate the power supply so that it doesn't hang off the body of the T-Tree.
The smaller PVC diameter of the branches also leaves no wiggle room, which can create strain on the T-Sticks themselves. I think going back to the 3" PVC design for the branches would be a good way to go.