Open davidjbrossard opened 7 months ago
That's actually an issue with the articles those terms are copied from. WE're allowing multiple definitions and including the articles where they come from to make sure the context in which those definitions exist are clear.
Let's get the authors in a discussion on IDPro's slack to see if we can resolve that conflict.
Okay that is good to know. I was actually looking for the definition of IAM and it doesn't seem like we have one. We define identity management on the one hand and access management on the other but not IAM as a whole
On Wed, Dec 13, 2023, 11:49 AM Heather Flanagan @.***> wrote:
That's actually an issue with the articles those terms are copied from. WE're allowing multiple definitions and including the articles where they come from to make sure the context in which those definitions exist are clear.
Let's get the authors in a discussion on IDPro's slack to see if we can resolve that conflict.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/IDPros/bok/issues/128#issuecomment-1854606781, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABPRFP2Q6PBHPUUQRYHJH4TYJIBFXAVCNFSM6AAAAABATQDNTCVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTQNJUGYYDMNZYGE . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>
In the terminology file, there are 2 definitions for access management. We should merge them or reject one of them. I suggest we keep the longer one: