Open stephenholleran opened 1 month ago
@stephenholleran I vote for remote_sensing_config
. I'm happy to either review a possible change or take this one if we agree to proceed with it. As discussed in the call, probably we should pack all the breaking changes in one DEV branch.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. While working on issue #254 in the PR #257 we realised that these additional properties (
logger_stated_device_datum_plane_height_m
andlogger_stated_device_orientation_deg
) could be applied to sodars too. Therefore the table these have gone under,lidar_config
is not appropriate anymore.Describe the solution you'd like We should rename
lidar_config
toremote_sensing_config
orrsd_config
orremote_sensing_device_config
or ??????Describe alternatives you've considered We can leave it as is but on our bi-weekly call, https://github.com/IEA-Task-43/digital_wra_data_standard/discussions/129#discussioncomment-9537330, we thought this wouldn't be a good idea and alienates sodars.
Additional context This would be a breaking change.