The current Turbine schema is currently a single schema but it might be better to split the schema into multiple schemas to for example enable having a definition of the rotor combined both a tower and monopile or a tower and floater design. Other ways of combining different parts of the definition could also be interesting.
Any thought on how this could and should be done is most welcome.
The current Turbine schema is currently a single schema but it might be better to split the schema into multiple schemas to for example enable having a definition of the rotor combined both a tower and monopile or a tower and floater design. Other ways of combining different parts of the definition could also be interesting.
Any thought on how this could and should be done is most welcome.