Closed dfarrell07 closed 11 years ago
Planner currently fails because goToNextDropOff is not defined. It doesn't seem to be anywhere in the repo, so it's not a self.* issue.
daniel:~/Robot/current/fresh/high-level/qwe$ grep -rni "goToNextDropOff" ./* ./planning/Planner.py:149: goToNextDropOff(armList[0], "sea") ./planning/Planner.py:152: goToNextDropOff(armList[1], "sea") ./planning/Planner.py:159: goToNextDropOff(armList[0], "land") ./planning/Planner.py:162: armId = goToNextDropOff(armList[1], "land ") ./planning/Planner.py:168: goToNextDropOff(armList, "sea") ./planning/Planner.py:172: goToNextDropOff(armList, "land") ./planning/Planner.py:179: goToNextDropOff(armList[1], "sea") ./planning/Planner.py:183: goToNextDropOff(armList[0], "land") Binary file ./planning/Planner.pyc matches daniel:~/Robot/current/fresh/high-level/qwe$
It may not be possible to recreate this bug until comm echos my move commands or I clean up the nav-loc hack @jschornick and I implemented that gets the code execution past this limitation. That shouldn't matter too much, as the bug is obvious.
fixed...
Planner currently fails because goToNextDropOff is not defined. It doesn't seem to be anywhere in the repo, so it's not a self.* issue.
It may not be possible to recreate this bug until comm echos my move commands or I clean up the nav-loc hack @jschornick and I implemented that gets the code execution past this limitation. That shouldn't matter too much, as the bug is obvious.