IETF-OPSAWG-WG / draft-ietf-opsawg-pcap

PCAP next generation file format specification
Other
267 stars 60 forks source link

Should we avoid a mix of 'time stamp' and 'timestamp'? #139

Closed fxlb closed 1 year ago

fxlb commented 1 year ago

There are many 'timestamp(s)', a few 'time stamp(s)' with mixed cases.

$ git grep -c -i 'time stamp' *.md draft-ietf-opsawg-pcap.md:2 draft-ietf-opsawg-pcaplinktype.md:1

$ git grep -c -i 'timestamp' *.md draft-ietf-opsawg-pcap.md:5 draft-ietf-opsawg-pcapng.md:27 draft-richardson-opsawg-pcapng-extras.md:2

Should we use only [tT]imestamp(s)?

henkbirkholz commented 1 year ago

Should we use only [tT]imestamp(s)?

definitely a +1

fxlb commented 1 year ago

In the RFCs, there are 23 times more timestamp than time stamp.

fxlb commented 1 year ago

If agreed, there is the PR #141.

guyharris commented 1 year ago

In the RFCs, there are 23 times more timestamp than time stamp.

"The RFCs" as in "all RFCs as of some recent date"?

guyharris commented 1 year ago

In any case, +1.

Pull request #141 merged.

fxlb commented 1 year ago

All RFCs retrieved a few months ago:

$ grep -i -r 'timestamp' $(find ../RFC-all -iname '*.txt')|wc -l
12636
$ grep -i -r 'time stamp' $(find ../RFC-all -iname '*.txt')|wc -l
543