IETF-TEAS-WG / ietf-teas-yang-path-computation

0 stars 4 forks source link

Section 5 Text: about the association among RPC, Request and Path reply #72

Closed haomianzheng closed 4 years ago

haomianzheng commented 4 years ago

What we have understood from the current text in Section 5 about RPC is: 1 RPC can include multiple requests, let's say N; For each request, there can be multiple paths computed, let's say M; Then 1 RPC can be replied with NxM paths, and the question is, how many request-id do we have? Is it N or NxM?

Text change proposal: OLD: This YANG model allows one RPC to include multiple path requests, each path request being identified by a request-id. Therefore, one RPC can return multiple responses, one for each path request, being identified by a response-id equal to the corresponding request-id. NEW: (if N) This YANG model allows one RPC to include multiple path requests, each path request being identified by a request-id. Meanwhile, one request, being identified by a response-id equal to the corresponding request-id, can only return one response with one or multiple paths computed. NEW2: (if NxM) This YANG model allows one RPC to include multiple path requests, each request being identified by a request-id. One request can return one response with multiple paths computed, each paths with a respective response-id. Multiple response-ids can be associated with one corresponding request-id.

italobusi commented 4 years ago

2020-05-25 Italo/Sergio

We have updated the text in section 5 to clarify that there are N responses where each response can report M computed paths

See updated editors' draft: https://github.com/rvilalta/ietf-te-path-computation/pull/70#issuecomment-633646734

italobusi commented 4 years ago

@haomianzheng : please review the proposed text changes

haomianzheng commented 4 years ago

The update in section 5 of #70 is fine to close this issue.