Open Issue 4: examples from MHD, PIXm, and PDQm

[JohnMoehrke]

The audit examples are brought in from MHD, PIXm, and PDQm; and “adjusted” to fit the RESTful pattern. This adjustment is not necessary, but follows with the proposal that these RESTful patterns are used as patterns in other Implementation Guides. Thus, these need to be evaluated as to if the adjustment is useful, or not. There should be no reason to update MHD, PIXm, or PDQm if there is not benefit, but there should also be no problem updating them. The adjustment here was more as an exercise in determining if the pattern concept could work, and not an excercise in forcing a change. The adjustment was to the .type and .subtype, and one profile was changed from import/create to read.

[JohnMoehrke]

stay as an open issue? Or do we remove these examples?

[JohnMoehrke]

• create three issues, one for MHD, one for PDQm, and one for PIXm. - these will become formal CPs, and processed as CPs.
• create a issue on mCSD to create AuditEvent.
• the changes to MHD, PDQm, PIXm, and mCSD would dependon BasicAudit (once formally published)
• the CP likely would be focused on the sushi (FSH) content, but have link to a branch/pull-request rendering
• the given content should be moved to a Volume 2 appendix in this IG.
• remove the open-issue