Open gregoriocanal opened 1 week ago
gcanal@consorzioarsenal.it
No response
All the transactions in the security considerations already requires auditing (e.g YY1 YY2 YY3 YY4... ) So if not ATNA i think BALP?
{"High"=>"Important issue where there is major issue to be resolved. Requires discussion and debate."}
It Is not high
Contact Details
gcanal@consorzioarsenal.it
Section Number
No response
What is wrong
All the transactions in the security considerations already requires auditing (e.g YY1 YY2 YY3 YY4... ) So if not ATNA i think BALP?
Describe the solution you'd like
No response
Relevant log output
No response
Priority
{"High"=>"Important issue where there is major issue to be resolved. Requires discussion and debate."}
Code of Conduct