The Document Source Can Use ITI-65, ITI-105, or ITI-106

[slagesse-epic]

Section Number Identify the most specific section number the issue occurs (e.g. 4.1.2)

1:33.1.1.1

Issue Describe your issue. Don't write a book, but do include enough to indicate what you see as a problem.

ITI-106 is excluded from the set of transactions that the Document Source can choose from:

"The Document Source uses either the ITI-65 or ITI-105"

Proposed Change Propose a resolution to your issue (e.g., suggested new wording or description of a way to address the issue). The committee might simply accept your suggested text. Even if they don't, it gives a good sense of what you are looking for. Leaving this blank means you can't imagine how to resolve the issue, which makes it easier for the committee to admit they can't imagine how to resolve it either and leave it unresolved.

Change to "The Document Source uses either the ITI-65, ITI-105, or ITI-106 transactions".

Priority:

• Low: Typo or other minor classification that an editor can manage. Requires no group discussion.

[slagesse-epic]

This is also a problem in 1:33.4.2.2

Apparently this is handled by a separate use case 1:33.4.4

[JohnMoehrke]

yes. I don't see anything to change

[slagesse-epic]

In section 1:33.1.1.1, change "The Document Source uses either the ITI-65 or ITI-105" to "The Document Source uses either the ITI-65, ITI-105, or ITI-106 transactions".

[JohnMoehrke]

ah, will do