Closed slagesse-epic closed 1 year ago
open issue. ask if it is useful to keep the PCF break-glass given that there is no clear way for break-glass to be declared or to learn that break-glass would be useful to a given user that is authorized to declare break-glass.
made open issue PCF_20 (Issue #20)
Contact Details
slagesse@epic.com
Section Number
53.2.1 Implicit Option
What is wrong
The Implicit Option states that compliant systems must support the https://profiles.ihe.net/ITI/PCF/Policy-break-glass-only policy. However, the IG does not describe how break-glass would be implemented. Thus, it is unclear what a Consent Enforcer would need to do to comply with this requirement.
Describe the solution you'd like
Remove the requirement to support break-glass or specify what it means to support break-glass.
Relevant log output
No response
Priority
{"High"=>"Important issue where there is major issue to be resolved. Requires discussion and debate."}
Code of Conduct