Closed lynnfel closed 2 years ago
we do not have any control over the artifacts page.
I asked around, there does not seem to be a precedent for where to publish your Must Support requirements. There is one proposal that has a section "Conformance Expectations" that brings in the definitions of SHALL/SHOULD/MAY, defines Must-Support, and possibly other things that we might see as similar. Others are putting this on a similar level as security considerations. see us-core - https://build.fhir.org/ig/HL7/US-Core/conformance-expectations.html
I like it where we have it, on the front page. I could see it as being more visible. It could be more inclusive of other things mentioned in Appendix Z. It could define SHALL/SHOULD/MAY and point at our General Intro Appendix E - https://profiles.ihe.net/GeneralIntro/ch-E.html
decided today
Sounds good to me
note, some discussion on zulip that a Conformance Expectations could be a standalone html. We will watch this ongoing discussion and may change to that.
Section Number https://profiles.ihe.net/ITI/PDQm/index.html
Issue pointer to definition of 'Must Support on index page
Proposed Change PDQm home page contains this:
Must Support` PDQm uses Must Support in StructureDefinitions with the definition found in Appendix Z. This is equivalent to IHE use of R2.
Perhaps that should be moved to where the StructureDefinitions reside: https://profiles.ihe.net/ITI/PIXm/artifacts.html#structures-resource-profiles
Note, I have submitted the same issue for PIXm (https://github.com/IHE/ITI.PIXm/issues/84) and PDQm. The resolution should be the same.
Priority: