Closed lynnfel closed 2 years ago
We have discussed this before, and the model PDQm and MHD used is the current recommended pattern. I don't disagree that with small Volume 1, like PDQm, this is less friendly than the continuous method that PIXm used. However we have a pattern based on large volume projects.
I think we would need to define when is a volume 1 small enough to be continuous, vs a volume 1 that is too big and needing to be multiple sections.
This issue is not with PDQm, but rather with the supplement_template.
In PIXm (being prepared for public comment), when I am in Vol 1 content, I can scroll through the entire contents of Vol 1 (single webpage). In PDQm (like MHD), each sub-section (actor/transactions, options, ....) can only be accessed individually via the Vol 1 dropdown menu. What a pain. We should (all) use the PIXm model.