Open yjmaxpayne opened 4 months ago
Hi Ye Jun,
Reason is that they move fast and my original codes will undergo scrutiny and I will need to spend a lot of time debugging their comments to make it usable for IHPC PEC when I already have working codes.
Hi Ye Jun,
- We can create a branch for qibo-AWS development. 2 & 3. Not a good idea to combine Qibo PEC and IHPC PEC codes. I will keep the already-working PEC codes for AWS use under IHPC PEC. The Qibo PEC will be a separate development between me and them.
Reason is that they move fast and my original codes will undergo scrutiny and I will need to spend a lot of time debugging their comments to make it usable for IHPC PEC when I already have working codes.
I see; I think the PEC part is a good point. But I guess 3 (now changed to 4) should be also applicable to the fork (not a branch under the qibo-cloud-backends main branch. You can create a public repo under our IHPC GitHub Org to avoid disruption of Qibo's own progress for the cloud backends.
Hi @mho291 , fork created: https://github.com/IHPC-Quantum/qibo-cloud-backends_AWS. I think we can leave the PEC repo for PEC related developments only.
Hi Matthew and Tan Le,
May I suggest the following:
Fork Qibo PEC branch to the current PEC repoFor your consideration, thanks.