Open riannella opened 11 months ago
These seem to be added:
66141010000114 20231015 1 11010000107 30051010000102 en 900000000000013009 LOINC code ID 900000000000017005
66151010000111 20231015 1 11010000107 30051010000102 en 900000000000013009 LOINC code identifier 900000000000017005
66161010000113 20231015 1 11010000107 30051010000102 en 900000000000003001 LOINC code identifier (core metadata concept) 900000000000017005
It's true that the RF2 to OWL conversion process does not currently take the LOINC "alternate identifiers" from the RF2 files into the OWL ontology file. I have raised the question with the relevant group in the comments section here: https://confluence.ihtsdotools.org/display/mag/SNOMED+International+Proposal+to+change+the+RF2+Identifier+File+specification
@riannella A method to add this information has been suggested in the comment here: https://confluence.ihtsdotools.org/display/mag/SNOMED+International+Proposal+to+change+the+RF2+Identifier+File+specification?focusedCommentId=221184314#comment-221184314 I like the look of option 2. That could be added to the RF2 to OWL conversion tool fairly easily.
I downloaded the SNOMED release that includes the LOINC terms (as subclasses of Observable entity) from here: https://loincsnomed.org
When I convert this release to OWL, it does not include the identification of the original LOINC Term in the output owl file. The SNOMED browser includes this:
Any ideas how I can get this info (owl:equivalentClass?) via the conversion process?