Closed rombaum closed 3 months ago
@rombaum Is this an Asserted or Inferred view in Protege? To get a view like the SNOMED CT Browser you'll want the Inferred view of the hierarchy. Be sure the ELK Reasoner is installed as a plugin and is ran before toggling your view.
@rombaum Is this an Asserted or Inferred view in Protege? To get a view like the SNOMED CT Browser you'll want the Inferred view of the hierarchy. Be sure the ELK Reasoner is installed as a plugin and is ran before toggling your view.
@rwynne thanks. Thats explains it all to me. Thanks!
I have the issue that I see a difference hierarchy for multiple concept from SNOMED CT in Protege and in the SNOMED CT Browser. I will describe the issue and my workflow with the following example:
I use the following command
java --add-opens java.base/java.lang=ALL-UNNAMED -Xms4g -jar snomed-owl-toolkit-5.4.0-executable.jar -rf2-to-owl -rf2-snapshot-archives SnomedCT_InternationalRF2.zip
to create the owl file from the Snomed RF2 files (version 2024-06-01). When I have a look into the SNOMED CT Browser (version 2024-06-01) for 1,1-Dichloro-2,2-bis(p-chlorophenyl)ethane measurement (procedure) I have 4 parents before reaching the concept Procedure (procedure).
When I open the generated owl file in Protege I have the following hierarchy:
I also see that there is no direct relation between 1,1-Dichloro-2,2-bis(p-chlorophenyl)ethane measurement (procedure) and the respective parent defined (see on the right hand side under the property SubClass Of):
Is there an issue in creating the hierarchy or is there a error in my workflow?